Caddy 0.9 will allow you to plug in almost anything, including server types. This has huge implications: Caddy will soon be able to serve more than just HTTP. Why, or who cares? As I was musing earlier , imagine the joy of using an SSH server that: is not vulnerable to most memory mistakes like C …

Awesome!! Congrats Miek! You’re not alone in thinking about versioning and such… the whole build server that actually powers the download page with those plugins needs an overhaul. We’ll be working on it. :wink:

Thanks Matt. One question related to versioning. I’m now calling caddymain.Run() to run CoreDNS but this function sets the AppVersion and AppName to Caddy. Is there is way to override this?

Haha, well, maybe it’s time to have “the talk” about what Caddy really is. :smile: Now that Caddy is pieced together with a lot of different parts, is Caddy the core that all the plugins plug into, or is it the server type? If multiple server types, which one? It is kind of cyborg now. I have a pre…

Ack. Yes, some more guidelines on what is Caddy and what can be used by server plugin(s) would be nice. In this particular case (i.e. setting these specific values) moving them to a init function would solve this.

Making build.bash a go program makes also sense.

[image] matt: That’s a beautiful thing. FYI: I forgot to remove an entire directory and on this PR that ‘lines-deleted’ number went up to 8200. The dir that I removed contained another 1000 lines. So in all, we’ve almost deleted 10,000 lines of code :slight_smile: cloc tells me CoreDNS is no…

[image] miekg: Yes, some more guidelines on what is Caddy and what can be used by server plugin(s) would be nice. I agree. Part of the lack of documentation is mostly because I haven’t decided yet. Experience will tell! So we’re both still figuring out these details. :wink:

FTP server type to run a FTP-Server / Reverse Proxy with caddy work be awesome :slight_smile:

@pwFoo , Are you thinking anonymous FTP or a full fledged authenticated FTP implementation? In the latter case I’m curious what authenticated FTP has to offer that can’t be done better using ssh/scp. FTP as a protocol has a long history of not only a pain (e.g. NAT traversal) but also suffers from mo…

I think reverse proxy ssh / scp wouldn’t be possible / easy… So I’m searching or rev proxy file transfer solution for my docker environment.

Caddy Community

Server types other than HTTP

Plugins

show post in topic

Home
Categories
Guidelines
Terms of Service

Powered by Discourse, best viewed with JavaScript enabled